charts

Publications

Publication details

A probabilistic expert system that provides automated mammographic-histologic correlation: initial experience
Journal Article
Reference:
E. S. Burnside, D. L. Rubin, R. Shachter, R. E. Sohlich, E. A. Sickles. American Journal of Roentgenology, 182, 2, 481-8. Published in 2004.
Abstract:

OBJECTIVE.
We sought to determine whether a probabilistic expert system can provide
accurate automated imaging�histologic correlations to aid radiologists in assessing the concordance
of mammographic findings with the results of imaging-guided breast biopsies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS.
We created a Bayesian network in which Breast Imaging
Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) descriptors are used to convey the level of suspicion
of mammographic abnormalities. Our system is a computer model that links BI-RADS
descriptors with diseases of the breast using probabilities derived from the literature. Mammographic
findings are used to update pretest probabilities (prevalence of disease) into
posttest probabilities applying Bayes� theorem. We evaluated the histologic results of 92
consecutive imaging-guided breast biopsies for concordance with the mammographic findings
during radiology�pathology review sessions. First, radiologists with no knowledge of
the biopsy results chose BI-RADS descriptors for the mammographic findings. After the
histologic diagnosis was revealed, the radiologists assessed concordance between the
pathologic results and the mammographic findings. We then input the information gathered
from these sessions into the Bayesian network to produce an automated mammographic�
histologic correlation.
RESULTS.
We had a sampling error rate of 1.1% (1/92 biopsies). Our expert system was
able to integrate pathologic diagnoses and mammographic findings to obtain probabilities of
sampling error, thereby enabling us to identify the incorrect pathologic diagnosis with 100%
sensitivity while maintaining a specificity of 91%.
CONCLUSION.
Our probabilistic expert system has the potential to help radiologists in
identifying breast biopsy results that are discordant with mammographic findings and discovering
cases in which biopsy sampling errors may have occurred.

Full PDF version available here
Back to Search Results
 
Information last updated: Sun Oct 7 2007
Make Corrections to this Publication
Stanford School of Medicine